Structured intelligence reports on any company in less than 24 hours
The same analysis methodologies intelligence services use to evaluate strategic actors, applied to your business decisions. Open sources and official registries. No access to private information.
Premium architecture for executive control
Every strategic decision you make without complete intelligence is an unnecessary risk
The supplier that looks solid and the asymmetry you pay for
You make strategic decisions about suppliers, partners, acquisitions, or major clients with superficial information and no structured verification. Your competitors are already performing structured due diligence before signing. You still rely on the salesperson or on a quick Google search. That information asymmetry is expensive.
The acquisition that turns into a nightmare
Formal financial and legal due diligence takes 3–6 months and costs tens or hundreds of thousands of euros. Sixty percent of M&A deals fail because of issues good early intelligence would have detected. Preliminary intelligence costs ten times less and filters the opportunities that deserve the full process.
CSDDD and the obligation to know your suppliers
New supply-chain due diligence obligations and the AI Act will require you to prove that you knew the risks of your suppliers before signing. If you do not have a documented counterparty intelligence process, you will have a serious problem when someone asks for it.
Structured intelligence in 24 hours: what used to take weeks to assemble
Executive profile
1-page summary with the most relevant findings and the risk traffic light. Designed for the decision-maker with 2 minutes.
Corporate structure
Who truly controls the company down to the ultimate beneficial owner, history of changes in shareholders and directors, and links to other companies.
Financial position
Analysis of the latest financial statements in the Mercantile Registry: revenue evolution, debt, profitability, and alerts of financial deterioration.
Litigation history (CENDOJ)
Court proceedings as plaintiff or defendant in the last 5 years. Types of disputes, amounts involved, and current status.
Digital and reputational footprint
Media presence, relevant news from the last 12 months, reviews, and LinkedIn activity such as recent hiring or leadership changes.
Risk alerts
Detected warning signs: sanctions lists, insolvency proceedings, suspicious recent corporate changes, and discrepancies between public and declared information.
The difference between structured intelligence and searching someone on Google is methodological. Search returns results by relevance for the engine, does not cross-check sources or detect contradictions, omits information buried in non-indexed official registries, and has no analysis protocol. Structured OSINT intelligence works with a defined source pipeline, cross-checks information to detect inconsistencies, applies the Situation / Actors / Relationships / Risks / Alerts methodology, and produces an executive report with conclusions and confidence level.
The service works exclusively with public and legally accessible information: official registries, sanctions lists, public news sources, information published by the companies themselves, and public procurement data. We do not access private information, do not use interception tools or unauthorized access, and do not profile private individuals outside their corporate roles. All analysis complies with GDPR and Spanish data protection regulation.
Real scenarios
Opportunity screening was consuming 3–5 weeks of formal due diligence in 70% of ultimately discarded cases.
The legal team spent weeks on formal due diligence for opportunities that were ultimately rejected. Without a prior filter, the process was inefficient and expensive.
Implementation: OSINT report used as a filter before formal due diligence. Go/no-go criteria before involving the legal team.
65% less time spent on due diligence for opportunities that were not viable in the end. The legal team focuses on the 30% that pass the OSINT filter.
No supplier monitoring. A bankruptcy during an active project cost €380,000 in penalties.
The procurement director had no monitoring system for the financial health of more than 200 active suppliers. The collapse of a critical supplier during a live project was an unexpected blow.
Implementation: Quarterly monitoring of the 30 critical suppliers. Automatic alerts for corporate changes or signs of financial deterioration.
Early detection of financial deterioration in 2 suppliers in the first 6 months. Planned replacement before it affected projects.
Two service modes
Investment and return
Available as a one-off report or subscription. Exact pricing depends on the analysis universe.
One-off report
No setup
€1,000/report
Delivery <24 hours
6 sections of the standard report
Mid-sized company with standard sources
Urgent report (<6h): €1,300 (+30%)
No contract or commitment
Credited if you subscribe later
Standard subscription
Included
€450/month
Up to 20 companies under continuous monitoring
Automatic alerts for critical events
Weekly alert report only when something relevant happens
Full quarterly universe report
6-month minimum
Enterprise
Included
€1,200/month
Up to 100 companies under continuous monitoring
Everything in the Standard plan
Enhanced reports (offshore, PEPs, complex structures)
Guaranteed delivery SLA
6-month minimum