Any supplier contract analyzed in 10 seconds
The Supervisor detects abusive clauses, hidden penalties, and contradictions with your procurement policies before you sign. Calibrated to your internal policy. Always human in the final decision.
Premium architecture for executive control
Clauses signed without deep review are the main source of avoidable contractual liabilities
The contracts nobody reads and the liabilities that last for years
You are signing high-value contracts without structured, systematic analysis of risks and clauses. A single poorly reviewed contract can create financial liabilities for years. You have 40-page service agreements that legal has no time to review. They get signed. Two years later, the penalty clause nobody saw arrives.
The information asymmetry you pay for dearly
Your competitors are already doing structured analysis of risks and clauses before signing. You still rely on the salesperson knowing it or on a quick read. You do not have clear visibility into deadlines, obligations, and accumulated risks across your contract portfolio. That information asymmetry is expensive.
CSDDD and the new due diligence obligations
The AI Act and new supply-chain due diligence obligations will require companies to prove they knew and managed supplier risks before signing. A documented contract review process is the evidence that proves it.
A legal reviewer who has read all your previous contracts and knows your policies
The Supervisor extracts the full contract text, analyzes it against your procurement policy and a list of risk clauses, and generates a traffic-light report in 10–60 seconds. The decision to sign, negotiate, or reject is always human.
-
Extracts the full contract text (PDF, Word) and structures it for analysis
-
Analyzes the contract against your procurement policy and the standard list of risk clauses
-
Generates a traffic-light risk report (green/yellow/red) in 10–60 seconds
-
Lists the clauses that need attention with exact location (page + paragraph)
-
Compares against your internal policy: compliant or non-compliant?
-
Proposes alternative drafting for each detected risk clause
According to LawGeex (2024), a senior lawyer takes an average of 92 minutes to review a standard NDA. AI performs the same analysis in 26 seconds with a higher detection rate for problematic clauses (94% versus 85%). Applied to more complex contracts, manual review rises to 2–6 hours. The opportunity cost of not reviewing smaller contracts is usually higher than the cost of the problematic clauses they contain.
Source: LawGeex 2024The Supervisor’s differential advantage is not that it knows general commercial law. It is that it knows your specific procurement policy: liability limits, payment terms, renewals, exclusion criteria, and historically problematic clauses. All of this is loaded as reference documentation. The analysis is performed against your context, not against a generic standard. With every correction from the legal team, the system calibrates further. In a few months, it knows your company’s particularities better than any outsider.
Real scenarios
80 active suppliers. Only contracts above €50,000 were being reviewed.
The procurement director reviewed contracts manually. Smaller contracts were signed without review due to lack of time. The risk was precisely in those contracts.
Implementation: Supervisor connected to the supplier approval process. All contracts are analyzed automatically.
In 6 months it detected 8 contracts with problematic penalty clauses. The team renegotiated 3 and rejected 1. Estimated savings: €45,000 in avoided penalties.
Local contracts signed without central review. Inconsistent conditions across the network.
Each location signed local supply and maintenance contracts without headquarters review. Conditions varied enormously between sites.
Implementation: Supervisor calibrated to headquarters’ unified procurement policy. Location contracts are analyzed before signature.
Conditions standardized across the network. Removal of 12 contracts with automatic renewal without notice. Savings in annual legal audit costs: €18,000.
Frictionless integration. In weeks, not months.
Load procurement policy
You upload your procurement policy, existing framework contracts, and any list of problematic clauses you have identified. If you do not have a documented policy, we help you structure it.
Calibration with historical contracts
We analyze 20 historical contracts, anonymized or real, and compare the system’s result with your team’s original assessment. We adjust the risk parameters.
Production pilot with parallel review
The system analyzes new contracts in parallel with the legal team. We compare findings and calibrate divergences.
Go-live + monthly review
The system goes into production as a standard part of the procurement process. We review the most complex cases monthly to improve the models.
Investment and return
Indicative pricing by monthly contract volume. The exact price is defined in the free technical audit.
Standard
€1,200
€600/month
Up to 30 contracts/month
Analysis against your own procurement policy
Automatic risk traffic light
Alternative drafting proposal
1-page executive report
6-month minimum
Advanced
€1,200
€1,100/month
Up to 150 contracts/month
Everything in the Standard plan
Procurement ERP connector (SAP Ariba, Odoo, Dynamics)
Contract review in English, French, German, Italian, and Portuguese
Priority support
6-month minimum
One-off
No setup
€150/contract
No subscription commitment
Individual on-demand analysis
Delivery in under 24 hours
Ideal for evaluating the system before subscribing
Credited if you subscribe later